Explaining variance in the cumulus mammographic measures that predict breast cancer risk. Abstract mammographic density has conventionally been defined as the area of the mammographic image of the breast that is white or bright, and is presumed to reflect differing amo. Mammographic density was assessed by visual analogue scale vas, thresholding cumulus and fullyautomated methods densitas, quantra, volpara in contralateral breasts of 366 women with unilateral breast cancer cases detected at screening on entry to the study cumulus 3166 and in 338 women with cancer detected subsequently. Multivariate generalized linear models were used to evaluate the relationships between breast cancer risk factors and measures of mammographic density, adjusting for relevant covariates.
Comparing a new volumetric breast density method volpara tm. Breast density in quantifying breast cancer risk date. We use a public domain imageprocessing software for the fully. Volpara solutions volparadensity and breast cancer risk. Mammographic density defined by high pixel thresholds captures more. In this paper we compare a new volumetric breast density software package, volpara tm to an experts birads visual assessment and cumulus and show that all are closely related, whilst there is a less close relationship between cumulus percent breast density and absolute volume of dense tissue. These measures could potentially be implemented in future screening programmes, in the context of personalised screening or screening evaluation. Visually assessed breast density, breast cancer risk and. We analyzed data for 1,065 estrogen receptor erpositive breast cancer patients who underwent surgery between 2003 and 2006 and received at least 2 years of et, including tamoxifen and aromatase inhibitors. Breast density change as a predictive surrogate for. Volumetric breast density, digital mammography, breast cancer risk. Percent breast density is an estimate of the proportion of fibroglandular tissue as opposed to fat. The cumulus software was used to measure percent density, dense area, and nondense area for each mammogram.
These results support the further validation of this new method against breast cancer outcomes. Introduction the objective of this study is to compare different methods for measuring breast density, both visual assessments and automated volumetric density, in a breast cancer screening setting. Mammographic breast density mbd has been proven to be an important. Investigators used cumulus a semiautomated method for measuring breast density to examine the association of measured percentage of density in baseline mammogram with breast cancer risk. An automated approach for estimation of breast density. Breast densitys effects on cancer risk, detection a fast. A comparative study of volumetric and areabased breast density. Cumulus uses readerbased thresholds to define the breast edge and. Reliability of automated breast density measurements rsna. Breast density is a strong risk factor for breast cancer. Comparing visually assessed birads breast density and. In this paper we compare a new volumetric breast density software package, volparatm to an experts birads visual assessment and cumulus and show that all are closely related, whilst there is a.
A comparison of five methods of measuring mammographic. Breast cancer risk associations with digital mammographic. Qualitative versus quantitative mammographic breast density. The software calculates the breast density makeup of the patient by. Reliability of automated breast density measurements. A comparison of five methods of measuring mammographic density. There is a strong connection between breast cancer and the high rate of breast density.
In this paper we compare a new volumetric breast density software package, volparatm. Variability in a repeated measurement of breast density is lowest for volpara and quantra. Volparadensity is a fully automated breast density assessment software that. The risk of developing breast cancer and the risk of missing cancer at screening rise with. High mammographic density is associated with both risk of cancers. Pdf explaining variance in the cumulus mammographic. Forms were read using custom software and visual percentage density calculated. Cumulus, currently has the strongest published relationship with breast cancer risk 1, 3.
377 781 1101 539 1514 1355 76 216 287 493 1061 8 436 932 1400 845 333 1471 967 17 1465 1124 1194 1247 910 267 1011 137 1251 1150 584 865 894 323 1472 1543 38 939 337 1388 1328 337 920 1334 1138 1168 207 1182 1260